We next tried a selection of Metal-supporting games. In this test, the RX 560 managed a score of 96.28 while the RX 570 was around 28% faster at 123.13. That’s about 82% faster.Īnother OpenGL test, Cinebench R15, was next. In the Unigine Valley test, the RX 560 managed 22.7 frames per second, while the RX 570 clocked up 41.3 frames per second.
#BEST GRAPHICS CARD FOR MID 2010 MAC PRO MAC#
While rather less relevant that the other benchmarks, due to OpenGL being deprecated on Mac now that Metal has taken over as the official Graphics API, it’s still a useful comparison of the speed of different graphics cards. Next, we tried the venerable Unigine Valley 1.0 benchmark. Next, still in Geekbench, we ran the Geekbench 5 Metal benchmark.Īgain, just as with the OpenCL test, the RX 570 was way out in front, scoring 40,427 while the RX 560 scored just 20,658. In this test, the RX 570 was way out in the lead, scoring 37,983 – almost double the RX 560 card’s score of 19.479. Moving onto Geekbench for the next test, we first ran the Geekbench 5 OpenCL benchmark. Next, we tried the ubiquitous BruceX 5K benchmark, which makes heavy use of the GPU for calculations. That’s a difference of about 34%.įor the second test, we exported a 3 minute 4K project with color correction and various transitions from FCPX to ProRes 422. The RX 560 took 12.4 seconds to stabilize the clip, with the RX 570 taking just 8.2 seconds.
#BEST GRAPHICS CARD FOR MID 2010 MAC PRO PRO#
Benchmarks Final Cut Pro Xįor the first test, we tried stabilizing a 20 seconds long Cinema 4K clip, shot on the Fuji X-T30 at 200mbps in Final Cut Pro X.
This makes the RX 570 a clear winner in terms of connecting multiple displays.
The Asus RX 560 gives you a single DisplayPort 1.4, one HDMI 2.0 and a DVI output, while on the Gigabyte RX 570 you get three DisplayPort 1.4 outputs, along with one HDMI 2.0 and DVI. You shouldn’t have any issues running either card off a 400-500W Bronze PSU or higher. The RX 560 has a TPD of 80 Watts, while the RX 570’s TPD is 120 Watts. RAM: Kingston HyperX 16GB DDR4-26666Mhz.In this article, we’ll be taking a look at some benchmarks to find out if the performance difference between the two cards is sufficient to justify paying the extra money, or if you can get by with an RX 560 for GPU-intensive tasks like gaming and video editing.įor these tests, we used the Radeon RX 560 STRIX 4GB and the Gigabyte Aorus RX 570 4GB. The RX 560 and RX 570 are two of AMD’s cheapest GPU’s, and since they’re both based on the same Polaris architecture, they work out of the box in macOS Catalina, making them ideal for a budget hackintosh build, or for use in an eGPU enclosure on a real Mac.Īt the time of writing, the price difference between the two cards is pretty small, with a 4GB RX 570 costing around 30% more, on average, than a 4GB RX 560.
Best value GPU for hackintosh – Radeon RX 560 vs RX 570
0 kommentar(er)
